Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026tomorrow 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 5 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 10 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 11 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 20 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 28 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 42 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 50 days
All due dates

Fraud Reporting Under Section 143(12): The One Crore Dividing Line

Above one crore the auditor writes to the Central Government through a 45-day and 15-day sequence. Below it, to the audit committee within two days.

Published
Updated
Reading time
5 min
Views
19
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
Company Law
Published
September 7, 2026
Last updated
Oct 10, 2026
Reading time
5 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

The fraud reporting obligation

If the auditor of a company, in the course of the performance of his duties as auditor, has reason to believe that an offence involving fraud is being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees of the company, he shall report the matter to the Central Government.

However, as per the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015, the auditor shall report only those matters to the Central Government which involves or is expected to involve individually an amount of INR One Crore or above.

Why the two fraud reporting routes have such different timelines

Below one crore, the report goes internally and fast: the auditor shall report the matter to the Audit Committee under Section 177 or to the Board immediately within 2 days of his knowledge of the fraud, and it is disclosed in the Board's Report.

Above one crore, the process is external and deliberate — the auditor writes to the Board or audit committee, waits up to 45 days for a reply, and then has 15 days to send everything to the Central Government.

At first sight that seems inverted: the larger fraud gets the longer process. The reason is what each route is for.

The two-day internal route is a warning. It exists so that governance can act — freeze an account, suspend an employee, commission an investigation — before evidence disappears. Speed is everything and no external process would be faster.

The sixty-day external route is an accusation to the State, and it can lead to prosecution. Before that happens, the company must be heard. Hence the 45 days for the Board's reply or observations, which travel to the Government alongside the auditor's report and his comments on such reply or observations. The Government sees both accounts.

The safeguard against a company simply not replying is explicit: where the auditor fails to get any reply or observations within the stipulated period of 45 days, he shall forward his report to the Central Government along with a note containing the details of his report that was earlier forwarded. Silence delays nothing.

Note the standard that triggers the whole machinery: reason to believe. Not proof, not certainty. An auditor who waits for conclusive evidence has already breached the obligation.

The two fraud reporting routes

Below INR 1 croreINR 1 crore or above
Reported toAudit committee or the BoardCentral Government, after the Board
TimelineWithin 2 days of knowledge45 days for reply, then 15 days to the Government
DisclosureIn the Board's reportReport in Form ADT-4
If no replyNot applicableForward with a note recording the earlier report

The form and its delivery

The report shall be in the form of a statement as specified in Form ADT-4 on the letter-head of the auditor containing postal address, e-mail address, contact number, Membership Number and be signed & sealed by the auditor and same shall be sent through Registered Post with AD / speed post followed by an e-mail in confirmation to the Secretary, MCA.

The delivery requirements are unusually prescriptive, and for good reason. Registered post with acknowledgement due creates proof of dispatch and receipt; the confirming e-mail creates a second, dated record. An auditor discharging this obligation needs to be able to prove they did.

The sequence above one crore

  1. On knowledge of the fraud, forward the report to the Board or audit committee immediately, seeking reply within 45 days.
  2. On receipt, forward the report, the reply or observations, and the auditor's comments to the Central Government within 15 days.
  3. If no reply arrives within 45 days, forward the report with a note recording that fact.
  4. Use Form ADT-4, signed and sealed, by registered post or speed post.
  5. Follow with a confirming e-mail to the Secretary, MCA.

Common mistakes

  • Waiting for proof rather than acting on reason to believe.
  • Missing the two-day internal fraud reporting deadline for smaller amounts.
  • Treating an unanswered request to the Board as suspending the obligation.
  • Sending the report by ordinary means without a record of dispatch.
Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Fraud Reporting

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What does section 143(12) require?

That if the auditor of a company, in the course of the performance of his duties, has reason to believe that an offence involving fraud is being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees, he shall report the matter to the Central Government.

Does that apply to every fraud?

No. Under the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015, the auditor reports to the Central Government only those matters which involve or are expected to involve individually an amount of INR one crore or above.

An honest "we were late" filed today is better than a perfect return filed next quarter.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Fraud Reporting: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

That if the auditor of a company, in the course of the performance of his duties, has reason to believe that an offence involving fraud is being or has been committed against the company by officers or employees, he shall report the matter to the Central Government.

No. Under the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015, the auditor reports to the Central Government only those matters which involve or are expected to involve individually an amount of INR one crore or above.

Under rule 13(3), the auditor reports the matter to the audit committee under section 177, or to the Board, immediately within 2 days of his knowledge of the fraud, and it is also required to be disclosed in the Board's report.

The auditor forwards the report to the Board or audit committee immediately on knowledge, seeking their reply or observations within 45 days; on receipt, forwards the report, the reply or observations and his own comments to the Central Government within 15 days; and if no reply is received within 45 days, forwards the report to the Central Government with a note giving details of the earlier report.

A statement in Form ADT-4 on the auditor's letterhead, containing postal address, e-mail address, contact number and membership number, signed and sealed by the auditor, sent by registered post with acknowledgement due or speed post, followed by an e-mail in confirmation to the Secretary, MCA.

Officers or employees of the company — the section addresses fraud committed against the company from within it.