Next dueIncome Tax
21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 8 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 25 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 39 days 15 DECAdvance Tax · 3rd (75%) instalment · FY 2026-27in 63 days 31 DECBelated / revised ITR · AY 2026-27in 79 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 2 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 7 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 17 days
All due dates
Income Tax Live

Rule 54 and Rule 55 of Income-tax Rules 2026 — Slump Sale Report and Valuation Reference

Rule 54 of the Income-tax Rules, 2026 requires an accountant's report in Form No. 28 for every slump sale under section 77(4), before the section 63 specified date; rule 55 fixes...

Published
Updated
Reading time
5 min
Views
35
Questions
6 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • High Complexity
Topic
Income Tax
Published
September 8, 2026
Last updated
Oct 12, 2026
Reading time
5 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Applies to: FY 2026-27 (AY 2027-28)Verified against: Government sources

Rule 54 — the slump sale report

The rule is a single sentence: "In case of a slump sale under section 77(4), every assessee is required to submit a report from an accountant as defined in section 515(3)(b), in Form No. 28 before the specified date referred to in section 63." The 1962 parallel is rule 6H.

ElementDetail
TriggerA slump sale under section 77(4)
WhoEvery assessee — no class is excluded
By whomAn accountant as defined in section 515(3)(b)
FormForm No. 28
WhenBefore the specified date referred to in section 63
The deadline is the tax audit date, whether or not there is a tax audit

Rule 54 borrows the specified date referred to in section 63 — the tax audit date — as its own deadline, but it does not make the report conditional on a tax audit being required. An assessee below every audit threshold that effects a slump sale must still obtain and submit Form No. 28 by that date. The same borrowing appears in rule 66 for the Form No. 32 audit report.

Two practical consequences follow. First, the valuation work behind the report has to be complete well before the return, because the report precedes it. Second, since a slump sale usually settles in the middle of a year, the accountant is reporting on a transaction whose accounting treatment may still be open — which is why the supporting net worth computation should be fixed at the time of the transaction rather than at the year end.

Rule 55 — the Valuation Officer thresholds

The whole rule: for the purposes of section 91(1)(b)(i):

  • the percentage of the value of the asset shall be 15%; and
  • the amount shall be ten lakh rupees.

The 1962 parallel is rule 111AA. Rule 55 does no more than supply the two numbers that section 91(1)(b) leaves to be prescribed — the proportionate threshold and the absolute one. Both are read together with the section's own conditions for making a reference to a Valuation Officer.

Two thresholds, and the section decides how they combine

Rule 55 states 15% and ten lakh rupees without saying whether they operate cumulatively or in the alternative — that is settled by the wording of section 91(1)(b)(i) itself. Reading the rule alone is not enough to work out when a reference may be made; the rule only fills the blanks the section leaves.

Where the two rules sit

Both belong to the valuation machinery around capital gains. Rule 54 requires a professional report on a slump sale, where the consideration is a lump sum and the net worth computation is the entire dispute. Rule 55 sets the point at which the department may bring in a Valuation Officer to test a value. Alongside them sit rule 53, which computes fair market value of capital assets for section 77, and rules 56 and 57, which define the terms and set the method of determining fair market value generally.

RuleFunction
53Computation of fair market value of capital assets for section 77
54Accountant's report on the slump sale, in Form No. 28
55Thresholds for a reference to a Valuation Officer
56 and 57Definitions and the method of determining fair market value

Worked example

FactsPosition
LLP transfers a division as a going concern for a lump sum in AugustSlump sale; Form No. 28 required
LLP is below every audit thresholdStill required — rule 54 says every assessee
Return due 31 October; specified date under section 63 the sameForm No. 28 before that date
Net worth computation prepared at the year endToo late to support a report due earlier — fix it at the transaction date
Report signed by a person outside section 515(3)(b)Not a valid report
Department considers a Valuation Officer referenceThresholds of 15% and ten lakh rupees from rule 55 apply as section 91(1)(b)(i) provides

Compliance checklist

  • Identify a slump sale under section 77(4) as soon as it is contemplated.
  • Fix the net worth computation at the transaction date.
  • Engage an accountant under section 515(3)(b).
  • Submit Form No. 28 before the section 63 specified date, whether or not a tax audit applies.
  • Keep the fair market value working under rules 53, 56 and 57 with the report.
  • Note the 15% and ten lakh rupee thresholds in rule 55 when assessing valuation risk.
  • Read those thresholds together with section 91(1)(b)(i) itself.

Common mistakes

  • Assuming Form No. 28 is due with the return rather than before the specified date.
  • Treating the report as unnecessary where no tax audit applies.
  • Computing net worth at the year end.
  • Reading rule 55 in isolation from section 91(1)(b)(i).
  • Using a valuer's certificate in place of the accountant's report.
Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Rule 54

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

What does rule 54 require?

That in the case of a slump sale under section 77(4), every assessee submits a report from an accountant as defined in section 515(3)(b) in Form No. 28.

By when must Form No. 28 be submitted?

Before the specified date referred to in section 63 — the same date the tax audit report runs to.

A due date missed is rarely a matter of law — it is almost always a matter of calendar.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Rule 54: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 6 questions readers ask most on this topic.

That in the case of a slump sale under section 77(4), every assessee submits a report from an accountant as defined in section 515(3)(b) in Form No. 28.

Before the specified date referred to in section 63 — the same date the tax audit report runs to.

The rule says every assessee is required to submit the report in the case of a slump sale under section 77(4); it does not carve out companies or any other class.

For section 91(1)(b)(i), the percentage of the value of the asset shall be 15% and the amount shall be ten lakh rupees.

They are the thresholds that condition a reference to a Valuation Officer under section 91(1)(b).

Rule 54 corresponds to rule 6H and rule 55 to rule 111AA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962.