Next due
11 OCTGSTR-1 · Outward supplies · Sep 2026in 2 days 15 OCTPF & ESI · Contributions · Sep 2026in 6 days 20 OCTGSTR-3B · Summary return · Sep 2026in 11 days 21 OCTTax Audit Report · Form 3CA/3CB · AY 2026-27 · extended from 30 Sepin 12 days 30 OCTAOC-4 · Financial statements · FY 2025-26in 21 days 7 NOVTDS / TCS deposit · Deducted in Oct 2026in 29 days 21 NOVITR filing · Audit cases · AY 2026-27 · extended from 31 Octin 43 days 29 NOVMGT-7 / 7A · Annual return · FY 2025-26in 51 days
All due dates

Sections 117 to 119 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002: bar of jurisdiction, indemnity and opening of branches

"Save as otherwise provided in this Act", no court has jurisdiction over registration, bye-laws or their amendment, or any matter concerning winding up and dissolution. While a...

Published
Updated
Reading time
7 min
Views
11
Questions
5 answered
  • Expert Reviewed
  • Medium Complexity
Topic
Trust & Society
Published
October 2, 2026
Last updated
Oct 9, 2026
Reading time
7 min
0:00
Last updated: October 2026Verified against: Government sources

Section 117 closes the courts to certain matters, notably registration and winding up, and to decisions and orders made under the Act. Section 118 protects the Central Registrar and others for acts done in good faith. Section 119 lets a multi-State co-operative society that is not a co-operative bank open branches anywhere in India.

This article follows the Ministry of Cooperation copy of the Act read with the Multi-State Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2023, in force from 3 August 2023 (notification S.O. 3493(E)). None of these three sections was amended in 2023.

Section 117(1): matters closed to courts

"Save as otherwise provided in this Act, no court shall have jurisdiction in respect of- (a) the registration of a multi-state cooperative society or its bye-laws or of an amendment of the bye-laws; (b) any matter concerning the winding up and the dissolution of a multi-state cooperative society."

The opening words matter: the bar is "save as otherwise provided in this Act". The Act provides for appeals on registration and winding up orders (s.99), for arbitration of disputes (s.84), and for execution (s.94). Our articles on appeals and orders not open to appeal and reference of disputes to arbitration explain those routes. A civil court's jurisdiction is closed to the subject matter, but the Act's own routes remain.

Section 117(2): suits during winding up

"While a multi-state cooperative society is being wound up, no suit or other legal proceedings relating to the business of such society shall be proceeded with or instituted against the liquidator or against the society or any member thereof, except by leave of the Central Registrar and subject to such terms and conditions as he may impose."

PointWhat the text says
WhenWhile the society is "being wound up"
Which proceedings"suit or other legal proceedings relating to the business of such society"
Against whomThe liquidator, the society or any member
RuleNot to be proceeded with or instituted without leave of the Central Registrar
Conditions"such terms and conditions as he may impose"

The sub-section speaks of proceedings "against" the liquidator, society or member; it does not say whether proceedings by the society are affected. The text is silent on it. See our articles on the liquidator's appointment and powers.

Example. While the invented Gandak Multi-State Sugar Society is being wound up, a supplier wants to file a recovery suit against it. Under s.117(2) the suit may not be instituted, and a pending suit may not be proceeded with, unless the Central Registrar gives leave, which may carry terms and conditions. A supplier or society facing this can seek legal dispute resolution advice on the leave application.

Section 117(3): decisions and orders not to be questioned

"Save as otherwise provided in this Act, no decision or order made under this Act shall be questioned in any court." Again the exception is the Act's own provisions: appeals under s.99, review under s.101, and the arbitration scheme with its finality clause in s.84(3). The sub-section names no remedy outside the Act, and this article says nothing on any.

Section 118: indemnity

"No suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall be against the Central Registrar or, any person subordinate to him or acting on his authority or against any other person, in respect of anything in good faith done or purporting to have been done under this Act." The print reads "shall be against" with no verb such as "lie" after "shall be", and has a stray comma after "or"; the text is quoted as printed. The protection covers the Central Registrar, any person subordinate to him or acting on his authority, and "any other person", and applies to "anything in good faith done or purporting to have been done under this Act". It depends on good faith.

Section 119: opening of branches

"Notwithstanding anything contained to the contrary in any law relating to cooperative societies in force in a state, a multi-state cooperative society, not being a cooperative bank, may open branches or places of business in any place in India."

Two points follow. First, the section overrides State co-operative law on the point. Second, it excludes a co-operative bank: the section does not say what applies to the branches of a co-operative bank, and this article does not add anything. For a bank, the Act points to the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 in s.86(5) as substituted and in new s.120B, and the reader should check the current law for the corresponding provision. Our guide on the difference between a multi-State society and a State society puts the choice of scope in general terms.

What the 2023 Amendment Act changed

ProvisionBeforeAfter
ss.117, 118, 119As printed aboveNot amended
s.86(5) and s.120BNo reference to the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 for winding up and banking businessBoth now refer to it

Need help with a jurisdiction question?

Whether a court can hear a matter, or whether leave is needed because a society is being wound up, is often the first question in a dispute. Our team can look at the order, the Act and the stage of proceedings with you under legal dispute resolution.

Key takeaways

  • Courts have no jurisdiction over registration, bye-laws, amendments, winding up or dissolution, save as the Act provides.
  • During winding up, suits against the liquidator, society or a member need the Central Registrar's leave.
  • Decisions and orders under the Act are not to be questioned in any court, save as the Act provides.
  • Acts done in good faith under the Act are protected from suits and prosecutions.
  • A society that is not a co-operative bank may open branches anywhere in India.

Read next

Disclaimer: Based on the Ministry of Cooperation copy of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 read with the Multi-State Co-operative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2023 (in force from 3 August 2023), as consulted on 2 October 2026. The Multi-State Co-operative Societies Rules, 2002 as amended, later notifications and later amendments are not covered and should be checked. This article is general information, not legal advice; check the official text before acting.

Quick recapKey facts & short answers

Key Facts About Sections 117 to 119

  • Applies in: All states across India, under the relevant central law.
  • Mode: Mostly online via the official government portal.
  • Typical timeline: Ranges from a few days to a few weeks depending on the case.
  • Non-compliance: May attract penalties, interest or late fees.
  • Expert help: TaxClue completes the entire process end to end for you.

Can a civil court decide on the registration of a multi-State co-operative society?

Section 117(1)(a) says no court has jurisdiction in respect of registration, bye-laws or amendments, save as otherwise provided in the Act.

Can I sue a society that is being wound up?

Only with the leave of the Central Registrar, on the terms and conditions he may impose.

What is not written down will be remembered differently by everyone involved.

— TaxClue Compliance Desk

Sections 117 to 119: a key compliance topic in Indian tax and corporate law that businesses and individuals must understand to remain compliant.

Related Services & Guides

Was this article helpful?
About the author
13,350 articles
Vikas Sharma Verified expert Tax & Compliance Expert

Experienced in company registration, GST, trademark, and compliance. Helping Indian businesses stay compliant.

Last reviewed: Live

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute professional tax, legal or financial advice. Laws, rates and due dates change and can vary by individual case — always verify with the relevant government source (e.g. mca.gov.in, incometax.gov.in) or consult a qualified professional before acting. TaxClue accepts no liability for decisions taken based on this content.

People also ask

Questions, answered

Short, direct answers to the 5 questions readers ask most on this topic.

Section 117(1)(a) says no court has jurisdiction in respect of registration, bye-laws or amendments, save as otherwise provided in the Act.

Only with the leave of the Central Registrar, on the terms and conditions he may impose.

It protects the Central Registrar, any person subordinate to him or acting on his authority, and any other person, for anything done in good faith under the Act.

Yes, unless it is a co-operative bank: "any place in India", notwithstanding State co-operative law.

No. These sections were not amended.